Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handmade Lace Wigs
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Handmade Lace Wigs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article has no references or external links to suggest any type of significance. EzPz (talk) 11:31, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - clearly just an opportunity to link to an e-commerce site, but that's not what Wikipedia is about. Stalwart111 13:30, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. We already have an (unfortunately unsourced, but non-spammy) article for Lace wig which makes this one redundant. Mabalu (talk) 17:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - linking to an online store and is written too much like an advertisement with no sources. Delete as per WP:PROMOTION Adrianw9 (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article links to an online store and also looks a bit promotional. StevenD99 Talk | Stalk 02:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As Malabu points out, there is already an article on Lace wigs, and there is no suggestion that there is anything different about handmade ones that could justify the split. Presumably all are handmade to a degree and if not any significant differences could be covered in the main article. --AJHingston (talk) 10:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.