Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopichand Jasoos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gopichand Jasoos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about a Bollywood film, sourced only to (non-WP:RS) IMDb since creation in 2012. The InterWiki links gave no other source. A WP:BEFORE search turned up only the press pack and a passing mention. A search for the Hindi title गोपीचंद जासूस fared no better. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Narky Blert (talk) 12:40, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:49, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Has been rarely edited since creation. -Cupper52 (talk) 15;59, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Comment by nom to Cupper52. That is no argument. Some of my articles have rarely been edited since creation. I like to think that's because I did a good job. It's as bad an argument as "this article has been viewed x thousand timwa in the last 30 days, therefore the topic is notable". Narky Blert (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and certainly WP:SIGCOV among many others. No citations. No different than every other Hindu movie. Tennis Anyone?^Talk 16:16, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia needs to stop being an IMDb mirror.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no reviews of an acceptable length nor any sign of meeting any other criteria listed at WP:NFILM; no obvious redirect or merge target available Spiderone 13:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.