Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glossary of Pendragon Adventure terminology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Glossary of Pendragon Adventure terminology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This list of terms has nothing to establish any sort of overall notability, and it has little worth as a companion article. Were it to be within the main article, it would likely be cut during regular cleanup, so its existence is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - This looks to me like a hearty helping of fancruft, and nom's right about it being cut if merged. Not to mention, it's a pretty unlikely search term, so little is gained from redirection. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 21:41, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above and nom. I'd like to believe that this could be merged somewhere, but I think TTN is right. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.