Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gina Grad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:23, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gina Grad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of the third party sources do more than mention her--I suspected this from their titles, but I confirmed by reading the sources . DGG ( talk ) 06:22, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV. Sources range from self-published,[1][2] to user-generated,[3] to passing references,[4][5][6][7]. Subject won two awards from her theater department in college,[8][9] but neither award seems "well-known and significant" enough to satisfy WP:ANYBIO #1. Most coverage outside article is limited to her role on Adam Carolla's podcast, but again, passing mentions only. Only this interview would seem to help establish notability, but a single source is not sufficient. Levdr1lp / talk 14:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:IMPORTANCE. Working menial jobs in the Los Angeles entertainment industry does not make a person notable. 20:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.