Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Boulle
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Spartaz Humbug! 06:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Francis Boulle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet notability guidelines, nor can it be attributed to reliable sources (Channel 4 claims which are unsupported cannot be counted as such) and it may even be perceived as advertising - Wikipedia:Deletion policy. See discussion page - attempt to find reliable sources has failed. Bobadillaman (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Surely the Independent and the London Evening Standard are both reliable sources and both are cited in the article. Could you explain your concerns more clearly?—S Marshall T/C 00:26, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.