Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FoodMayhem (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:05, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FoodMayhem

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable - trivial mentions. Was no consensus in 2008 when standards were much lower. Boleyn (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Short New York article appears to be about it... Caro7200 (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While their site does appear to get some trivial mentions (e.g. photos being used in other articles), it fails to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Obviously, if more in-depth and reliable sourcing emerges which causes it to pass WP:NCORP at some point in the future, I would not object to it being re-created. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:11, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.