Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florida sex sting scandal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SNOW The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:48, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Florida sex sting scandal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is WP:SYNTH, possibly to promote the blog http://floridascandal.blogspot.com/ . All of the facts given seem to be true, and they seem to appear in the sources they're cited to. Nevertheless, the way that they are put together into an article about something called the "Florida sex sting scandal" seems to be solely a creation of the above-linked blog, and does not appear in reliable sources. — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the link to the Florida Blog, i have no association with that blog, I am only trying to address a serious issue here in Florida, which is ruining many peoples lives unfairly. I have linked to numerous sources showing these stings are in fact illegal and entrapment, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matahari847 (talk • contribs) 01:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia does not expose the truth. MsFionnuala (talk) 01:18, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insect bites to the genitals are certainly an important problem, but not a fit topic for WP.Just kidding. The real reason is... the whole article is classic WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, and any number of other fundamental no-nos. EEng (talk) 03:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original research: this is written like a report or presentation seeking to prove a point, not like an encyclopedic article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. It's not like a presentation seeking to prove a point; it is a presentation seeking to prove a point. EEng (talk) 12:39, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is classic WP:OR Zaldax (talk) 19:48, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete All synth/or. unless reliable sources can be found discussing from this POVGaijin42 (talk) 20:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no independent and reliable sources. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought. -- Luke (Talk) 23:34, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.