Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five Crowns (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:57, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Five Crowns (game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This doesn't have the coverage for a standalone article. I would favour deletion, but an ATD could be merge/redirect to Set Enterprises#Games. Boleyn (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as suggested, seems to be a variant of the game. Oaktree b (talk) 21:36, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Noting it certainly is not a variant of SET. Not even close. And if it isn't set you are saying it is a variant of, I don't know what you are saying. Hobit (talk) 19:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep Lots of reviews in German. Even a mini-review (5 paragraphs) by Orson Scott Card, not worth much, but worth noting. https://www.spielkultisten.de/ is, I think, generally considered reliable (though I'm having problems finding anything on their site). Hobit (talk) 22:06, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hobit, Good finds. Which of those are reliable, now this is the question... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:16, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, hoping that someone who reads German can help us out. Hobit (talk) 19:27, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:14, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 07:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.