Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filmfare Best Actress Award (Tamil)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

... and 16 other similar lists that can be found on Filmfare Awards South :

Contested prod (the article got deleted and was recreated). Filmfare Awards South has a list of similar lists, some were deleted and some weren't. Weak Delete per lack of sources. -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Listing the other articles of this festival. Some of them are either contested prods or recreations too. It seems fair to do the same treatment to all the lists. -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- -- lucasbfr ^talk 14:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
comment I am not sure what is meant by the "lack of sources" for such a list, when the individual articles exist for almost all the individuals and films. DGG 03:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Lack of sources is not an appropriate reason for deletion, esp. when notability is clear -- the articles weren't tagged with appropriate templates before the nomination. Sources are easy to find for this with little help from Google ([1][2] etc.) utcursch | talk 14:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just to clarify, some of the lists of this festival were prodded, speedied at creation as non notable or deleted by administrators as being unsourced. I am looking for having a debate about the notability of these articles, instead of having endless recreation of them after the deletion. -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are articles on the Oscars, Emmies, Grammies and so on, so why shouldn't there be articles on these Indian awards? (I hope there are Indian wikipedians willing to improve the articles.) Pharamond 16:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, it is useful to have a reference on film awards that don't happen in Hollywood, on the other hand the total lack of secondary sources makes it questionable if these are notable even in their own country. I would prod them all as unsourced and if not sourced by next month delete and salt Alf^Photoman 17:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Doug Bell ^talk 09:01, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.