Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fifth C

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:30, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fifth C

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Content is promotional in nature and largely unsourced. Sources in the article are primary or unreliable; I was unable to find any better. M4DU7 (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under A7 and/or G11. Foxnpichu (talk) 11:08, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 11:11, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are no references that meet the requirements for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.