Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Facility information model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Building information modeling. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Facility information model

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG as I could not find any coverage in secondary sources at all Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 21:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Building information modeling. While there are some sources for facility information model, it is a part of building information modeling as in "divide BIM into four models, Program information model (PIM), Design information model (DIM), construction information model (CIM) and facility information model (FIM)". StarryGrandma (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@StarryGrandma Thanks for proposing this alternative! I would be ok with it . Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 19:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect support - plenty of secondary sources come up on a quick Google Books search, but it seems to be a relatively niche technical tool more useful in an article with greater context. Some of the info on related systems/programs could also probably be merged into Facilities management easily as well, if someone so chooses. originalmess^talk 09:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.