Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Paintbrawl 4
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Extreme Paintbrawl. Randykitty (talk) 12:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Extreme Paintbrawl 4 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability is not inherited, and it doesn't meet WP:GNG [Username Needed] 11:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 12:45, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete and redirect to Extreme Paintball (which looks notable--for how bad the game was). This particular iteration doesn't appear to have reliable sources. --Izno (talk) 13:09, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Will reassess. --Izno (talk) 18:27, 19 April 2018 (UTC)- Comment - @Izno: - I assume you meant Extreme Paintbrawl? Also, logically if this is being put up for AfD, Extreme Paintbrawl 2 should go with it (unless the reviews that are even worse (3rd worst ranked game)) give that one sufficient? The sources for both look pretty similar. I would imagine the paintbrawl 3 did exist, if all the others were there, but can't speak to that. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:57, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, I may need to revise my comment after review then. I looked for "Extreme Paintball"... --Izno (talk) 18:27, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- Reviews at IGN, GameSpot, and Igromania. I can fall either way here. This is at least a merge if not a weak keep, probably to Extreme Paintbrawl. --Izno (talk) 04:28, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - lacking as the article is, with three distinct sources, two of which are clearly in-depth, and a potential other source (my google didn't feel like translating) I feel that WP:NVG is satisfied - its notability is self-derived from multiple sources in its own right. I don't feel a merge is necessary. Nosebagbear (talk) 08:11, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merge worth a sentence, a small footnote in history. Szzuk (talk) 17:10, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Extreme Paintbrawl. And, yes, Nosebagbear is correct that Extreme Paintbrawl 2 should also be merged. A selective merge may be sufficient. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:12, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.