Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethel Flora Fortune

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ethel Flora Fortune

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet GNG; no significant coverage beyond being a Titanic passenger. –dlthewave ☎ 16:58, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:57, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:57, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing in the article that makes her noteworthy for a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 23:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --1l2l3k (talk) 21:41, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:45, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.