Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ester Macrì

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 09:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ester Macrì

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable by WP:PROF: extremely low citations for her papers; 9, 5, 2, 1 No indication that her book is importantk of that she meets WP:GNG DGG ( talk ) 08:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Tiny citations on GS not remotely enough for WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Keep A Google books search shows good references, mostly in Italian. She just did not format the page right and did not add those sources. I wonder why she has no page on the Italian Wiki. Yet, the mentions seem good enough to me. Ode+Joy (talk) 10:53, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instated of saying shows good references, please hint couple of them if meet WP:SIGCOV. Its 15 minuets I'm Googling in English and Italian to find significant coverage.Misasory (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Too late now, with so many delete votes, the fate of the page is clear, regardless. Ode+Joy (talk) 23:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It looks far too soon for WP:NPROF for this 2013 PhD. No other sign of notability -- being author of her PhD dissertation does not grant notability, and while citations shown on Google Books may contribute, the level is way below what we'd be looking for, even in a medium-to-lower citation field. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 13:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:PROF. I couldn't find any reliable sources focusing on her or her works.Misasory (talk) 13:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as doesn't meet WP:NPROF. Not convinced meets WP:NAUTHOR either, but might be able to be convinced otherwise. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Single-digit citation counts do not meet WP:PROF#C1. The "book" is just her doctoral dissertation, and I did not find published reviews, so it does not appear to contribute towards WP:AUTHOR notability. No other notability criteria look likely. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:20, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.