Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Delude
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete by Martijn Hoekstra (talk · contribs) as "A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". (non-admin closure) Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 18:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Eric Delude (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A PROD tag was removed by the article's SPA creator without any improvement or the addition of any citations. I suspect this could have been speedied under db-bio but my understanding is that the removal of the PROD tag requires the article to be brought to AfD. This individual does not meet the GNG or the guideline for amateur athletes and I can find absolutely nothing in the way of reliable sources. Ubelowme U Me 13:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Unsourced BLP. Should be speedied. Harry the Dog WOOF 13:46, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. GregJackP Boomer! 13:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per WP:A7 as a vanity page. No claims of importance as a known athlete. Research turns up the same lack of results. Does not meet General Notability Guidelines or WP:BLP or WP:ATH. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:51, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unsourced and unverifiable BLP. My search for sources came up empty. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, tagged. No claim to notability. Hairhorn (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.