Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No rationale given by nominator and from a cursory look at sources, no WP:BEFORE was performed. (non-admin closure) _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:25, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Engare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

renown UnitedPowers ^Talk 15:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - sufficient evidence of notability from significant coverage in a number of reliable sources including publications such as Ars Technica and Rolling Stone which do not predominantly cover video games, and recognition from notable industry professionals such as Robin Hunicke and Rami Ismail as well as verifiable evidence of both Iranian and international industry accolades. As there is a lack of specialised notability guidelines for video games, the general notability guideline should be used as a measure of notability - according to these the subject matter clearly passes. Felineastatine (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:56, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - No rationale for deletion. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 20:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.