Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enewetak (band)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — CactusWriter (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Enewetak (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources, although the band being named after a place makes searching for information about the band more difficult. The references presently being used in the article are non-RS, such as an online review of another band's song, a webstore and MySpace. toweli (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, United States of America, and California. toweli (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. No significant coverage to prove notability. A band that has discography from 1995 - 2012 would have had plenty of online sources that show WP:SIGCOV if indeed notable. Prof.PMarini (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - The first two sources used in the article include a brief mention in a discussion of a different band, and a two-sentence review by a blogger of an out-of-print EP. Otherwise the social media-related sources are inadequate and I can find nothing else from reliable media sources. The band got some gigs and minor Internet chatter back in the day, but there's not nearly enough for an encyclopedic article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.