Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Glazer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 02:25, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Glazer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not meet WP:GNG. Lack of significant coverage about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. GermanKity (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 08:37, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable journalist. Yes, she received the 2017 New York Press Club Award for Consumer Reporting. Yes she was interviewed as an alumni at Northwestern. And yes this article exists, but it really isn't an IRS source. And none of these, individually or combined, are sufficient to satisfy WP:JOURNALIST. Cabrils (talk) 23:10, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:12, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.