Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvira Estela Márquez Dreyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Forced disappearance#Argentina. The redirect may be contested at suitable venues (WP:RFD) if people are so inclined Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elvira Estela Márquez Dreyer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was deprodded with the rationale, "I saw sources in web search". No sign they pass WP:GNG. Delete as per WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to some page on Argentinian history. No notability of itself. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, sad but not notable; per WP:Memorial. Kierzek (talk) 13:43, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To consider possible redirect targets
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 05:21, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing to indicate she is different than hundreds of other descamisados, and no justification to have articles on all of them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.