Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eluzé Living

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eluzé Living

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An organisation started by a young entrepreneur. Sources provided consist of an interview with the company's owner in a weekly publication, and a few blogs and self-published sources. Google and Google News don't find anything more substantial. This topic therefore fails both WP:ORG and WP:GNG. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 17:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support delete for the reasons given above. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:19, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support delete seems promotional in intent, given that the editor has uploaded the company logo as an image file created by themselves. Ning-ning (talk) 18:42, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment any organisation which has "products and services ... infinitely difficult to obtain" is not really going to prosper, is it. Even in Runcorn. 109.149.205.23 (talk) 18:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment But it has diamond-encrusted membership cards made of precious metals. Made by Garrards, the world's oldest jewellers. Imagine one of those cards sandpapering the inside of your wallet. A hoax or a satire. Ning-ning (talk) 04:25, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete the company has been dissolved so it no longer operates and will not be generating any more coverage in reliable sources; if this is the best that can be done on the existing sources, it doesn't meet WP standards. Bencherlite ^Talk 07:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.