Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth LaPensée

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT, invalid deletion rationale. If a history merge is desired, this is not the way to accomplish it. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth LaPensée

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete this page to make room for draftspace version, which is better organized and wikified. A merge of the two is also possible. Ham tech person 21:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Procedural, the need for a histmerge with a draft is not a proper deletion rationale. -- ferret (talk) 00:48, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.