Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliburn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE without prejudice to the creation of a redirect j⚛e decker ^talk 02:30, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eliburn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:GNG, it has some basic Ghits but not much. As for WP:NPLACE, it depends if this is considered a 'larger neighbourhood' or 'smaller suburb' and I couldn't be sure that this falls into the former. As this has been tagged for notability for 7 years and I couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY, I've taken it to AfD. If found non-notable, could be worth a redirect to Livingston. Boleyn (talk) 14:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 14:35, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.