Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward J. Resch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edward J. Resch

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He was CFO of multiple large companies. But that itself is not enough to justify him having his own article.

The references given are just database profile links which you can find on many executives. I can't find much independent sources on him specifically which are in-depth. There are articles about his retirement from State Street but they are more to do with the company itself and just make a mention of him. Imcdc (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, he was CFO of State Street, a major bank that is classified as systemically important bank by the Financial Stability Board and is a Fortune 500 company. I have not found a guideline on specific notability criteria for business people, but it is reasonable to make a parallel with WP:POLITICIAN. Members of national legislative bodies are presumed to be notable, so it is reasonable to make the same presumption for officers of Fortune 500 companies, and their equivalents elsewhere. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:49, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:50, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.