Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ectodermal Macleod Dexatronia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PeterSymonds (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ectodermal Macleod Dexatronia

Pretty sure this is a hoax. jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 17:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Definitely a hoax. Parslad (talk) 17:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No relevant ghits on the name or the doctor. PENTAX medical company develops imaging products, not medicines. Appears to be a hoax or a well kept secret. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 17:46, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Certainly a fictitious disease. Note that the contributor is a single-purpose account who has contributed nothing to Wikipedia besides this article. That alone does not disqualify any article, but it may be a contributing factor when the genuineness of the subject matter is in question. •••Life of Riley (talk) 17:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's nothing anywhere in my medical texts that comes close to describing this condition - not in Harrison's Medicine, not in Cecil's Medicine, nothing on UptoDate. This smacks of a hoax. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.12.102.170 (talk) 17:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, health-related hoax should qualify as blatant ("only known symptom of the disease is pain while sleeping"). NVO (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Description of the disease makes absolutely no sense medically. Obviously complete bollocks. Anaxial (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Edward321 (talk) 01:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hoax. Axl ¤ [Talk] 16:33, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.