Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESTIEM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ESTIEM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From prod (declined by the creator): "This articles fails to establish notability, failing Wikipedia:Notability (organizations)." _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 18:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article has sufficient references from secondary sources to make it notable. Inwind (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Inwind: O'really? Please list them here and explain what makes those non-primary references mainstream and reliable, as required by WP:RS. The one ref you added doesn't look like either, I am afraid. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.