Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Docurated
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 11:23, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- Docurated (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject seems to fail WP:NCORP. A number of trivial news mentions and PR sources online, but nothing that meets the "depth of coverage" section of the relevant notability guideline. VQuakr (talk) 03:06, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The only source on the page is not Reliable. When you click on the flag of the source referenced, you are taken to some kind of phony sales page. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! (Y) 15:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Zero notability.Staszek Lem (talk) 16:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete: A Highbeam search turns up various press release based items, plus an indication that the firm was one of 28 finalists in TechCrunch Disrupt NY 2013 Reports Startup Battlefield but nothing indicating WP:CORPDEPTH notability. AllyD (talk) 06:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - A News search found several results but mostly press releases and a wider search provided a few more results but basically the same. Not notable yet. SwisterTwister talk 06:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.