Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disenchanter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:50, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disenchanter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks significant mentions in reliable sources, fails WP:GNG as a non-notable fictional element. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:29, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Outside of the one brief entry in the top-ten humor article already in the article, I am not finding any significant coverage of this creature outside of uses in game books. There is no actual coverage that would allow this to pass the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. DnD fancruft, fails NFICTION/GNG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. No need to retain content. TTN (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to e.g. List of Advanced Dungeons & Dragons 2nd edition monsters. No benefit in removing the information based on the one secondary source, minor though it may be. Daranios (talk) 16:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.