Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Review
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BD2412 T 00:52, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Digital Review (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet GNG. The given links aren't significant coverage in reliable sources. Aside from this, I can't find reliable coverage with a quick search. Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate list of info, not every website to be featured in every "Top 100" event needs an article. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:13, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom.Babbu2208 (talk) 17:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete The article is little more then a listing of the website and Wikipedia isn't a directory. There doesn't seem to be any in-depth reliable sources out there to turn it into a proper encyclopedic article either. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:02, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.