Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diabetic Rockstar Inc
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 12:37, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Diabetic Rockstar Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Perhaps a worth charity but outside of a Reader's Digest mention it never seems to have picked up any traction. Of links in the article only a couple are active and independent. Mangoe (talk) 12:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 20:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 20:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Delete. No WP:Reliable sources. Just not a WP:Notable topic. Very simple. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:47, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The site itself has no indication of ownership or qualifications, which is a real no-no for a site providing "medical" information. Like others I did not find reliable sources about the site, only a few blog posts and numerous broken links. LaMona (talk) 21:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.