Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Devar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found a review and added it, but couldn't find anything else except film database sites and sites centering on the music. I know this has well known actors in it, but WP:NOTINHERITED. It was tagged for notability in April, so here we are...is it notable enough to be kept? Donaldd23 (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I found coverage of the movie in The Friday Times, D.N.A. Sunday and The Essential Guide to Bollywood. — Toughpigs (talk) 00:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It seems to be lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable in-depth sources. The Friday Times piece is about an actor who played in the movie (not the movie itself), The Essential Guide to Bollywood is a brief 1/4 of a page single paragraph overview that is not in-depth, and The D.N.A. Sunday article is about the lyrics of Anand Bakshi (which again is not about the film). So, none of them work for notability. Outside of that, there's a review by molodezhnaja, but it seems to be a blog, and a brief mention of someone from the film by a "news outlet" (but again, it's not about the film either). There definitely doesn't seem to be the multiple in-depth reviews of it that are usually required for a film to be notable. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as there is enough reliable sources coverage identified in this discussion and in the article for a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Easily meets WP:GNG after recently added sources...Ngrewal1 (talk) 23:39, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Atlantic306, sources are not enough to show notability. (t · c) buidhe 11:51, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic306 voted for the article to be kept. Sunshine1191 (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Looks sourced well enough for a film from the 60s. Surprisingly the review is from a German source and the article is not an IMDB mirror either. Sunshine1191 (talk) 15:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.