Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Depression storage capacity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Soil science. czar 04:11, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Depression storage capacity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dicdef, untouched since 2009. Overly specific, dicdef, only one source. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Soil science, which has no mention of this aspect of the topic. This will improve the merge target article, as per WP:ATD-M. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:52, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I agree with Northamerica. It is a useful topic, but better dealt with under soil science. I get the feeling that there may be an even better article to redirect this article to than soil science, but I can't think of anything more concise at the moment. Kingofaces43 (talk) 00:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.