Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dellynne Catching

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 23:39, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dellynne Catching

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Catching was Miss Alabama. This alone is not enough to establish notability. Although the coverage seems to have come from across Alabama, it is still not enough to overcome the one event problems. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Concur with nom. Winning of a state level pageant is not sufficient to establish notability. Nothing else post-pageant either. MB 20:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. SST flyer 12:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a vanity page on an unremarkable individual. Articles on state-level pageant wins are routinely deleted. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:30, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject's only "claim to fame" is winning the Miss Alabama pageant. This went away on July 5, 1969, and a new Miss Alabama. There is nothing but this one event, that is an exclusion to the Basic criteria, concerning notability. Otr500 (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as the claims listed are clear, only best known for state-focused pageant events and nothing else aside from that, and there's nothing but the local news articles to support this, therefore there's no independent notability or substance overall. SwisterTwister talk 03:47, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.