Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decades in Colour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:23, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decades in Colour

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources/WP:NFSOURCES to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:NF. Not released WP:NFF Jbh (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per being TOO SOON. Even though we might consider an official New Zealand government source reliable enough, the un-aired project lacks enough other coverage to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:35, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a WP article on this subject is premature. A government grant was recently awarded to Greenstone TV, but beyond the press release (copied verbatim into this WP article) there is a lack of information to confirm when the project may be started or finished and in what way it is notable. Better as a draft at this stage. Regards Guffydrawers (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.