Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rusi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. As blatant promotion — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- David Rusi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP. No clear notability. Badly formatted and written. Reads like an advertisement. Also appears to be written by the individual. Kumioko (talk) 00:54, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I would have speedy deleted this as it reads entirely like an advertisement. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I would have too but I recently got beat up over CSD. Thanks to some of our fellow users I am extremely gun shy about submitting CSD's. Kumioko (talk) 01:35, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete With zero references, this is a BLP violation and needs to be speedy deleted. IMO it also fails WP:OR and WP:PROMOTE (part of WP:NOT). Notability cannot be known without evidence, and there is no evidence that this topic is or is not notable. Unscintillating (talk) 01:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: No reliable sources. Patent self-promotion. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 04:31, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.