Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dancing Beijing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There seems to be no interest in deletion, but no consensus whether to keep or merge. No prejudice towards the opening of a merge discussion on the talk page. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:07, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dancing Beijing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fixing malformed nomination for benefit of nominator - see rationale below Ego White Tray (talk) 15:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need a page for a single logo? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Userboker (talk • contribs) 03:47, 28 July 2012‎

Merge: I think it would be reasonable to merge this with 2008 Summer Olympics. Topher385 (talk) 17:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or Merge - The nominator doesn't actually give any valid rationale for deletion, and the article is sourced. Admittidly, a number of the sources speak of the logo only tangently, but several of them talk about it exclusively. And doing a serach brings up a couple other news articles about the logo that aren't yet being used as sources, talking about such things as a legal dispute that occurred because of it. I would have no opposition to merging the info into the main 2008 Summer Olympics article per Topher385 if others agree, however. Rorshacma (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to 2008 Summer Olympics. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:59, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - logo seems notable in its own right there are sources out there in addition to those given (e.g. [1], [2]) to allow a decent article to be put together. Nomination is basically a case of WP:IDONTLIKEIT - Basement12 (T.C) 02:03, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, not merge - article is well referenced, subject is notable. Merging doesn't make sense as the 2008 Summer Olympics article is already quite long. -Zanhe (talk) 02:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The symbol of the Olympics in Beijing is an overall element of the Olympics held in Beijing in 2008. It should reside with it's contemporary. Яεñ99 (talk) 08:45, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.