Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Petrovic
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Dan Petrovic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a blogger who appears to fail WP:N as well as WP:BIO as he hasn't received significant coverage in multiple reliable, third-party sources. The references listed are either trivial or first-party. I can't find any other coverage via the internet to evidence notability. ThemFromSpace 17:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO, yet another guy who blogs about SEO, with no significant coverage online from WP:RS. Captain Conundrum (talk) 17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Dan Petrovic is not a small name in search industry is like Barry Schwartz (technologist). He is also a well known in research of facts about search engines. Give me sometime..let me update the refernces. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ujjawalsunny (talk • contribs) 17:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LFaraone 01:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete could not find anything but small mentions. Does not meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 16:38, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- keep there are plenty of references to Petrovic from reliable sources - you can find them in the references. Search Engine Land, Search Engine Journal and SEOmoz are all top search engine optimisation blogs, and there are quite a few mentions on other authoritative sites. 130.180.253.158 (talk) 08:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC) — 130.180.253.158 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- please provide sources that meet WP:RS. LibStar (talk) 08:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.