Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CtrlS (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 19:58, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CtrlS

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the coverage found is basically PR. I would argue this fails WP:CORPDEPTH. US-Verified (talk) 19:34, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – fails WP:NCORP. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 20:44, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the first nom and this nom. ArcAngel (talk) 02:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't see the deleted CtrlShift article but the Singapore marketing company appears distinct from this Indian data center firm. Regarding this firm, the announcement-based coverage currently referencing the article is insufficient for WP:CORPDEPTH; some semi-advertorial coverage can be found [1] - enough to confirm this as a firm going about its business (under a Pioneer Group about which there is no article to serve as an WP:ATD), but insufficient to demonstrate attained notability here. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:05, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.