Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Clear (software development)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 13:06, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Clear (software development)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly written. Poorly sourced. Tagged for PROD in 2006... but the tag was deleted without explanation by an IP. Yaris678 (talk) 20:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 03:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13_(talk) 21:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a reasonably clear and simple explanation of the Crystal Clear Methodology that would give a starting point for someone wanting to go further but I do note that it has barely been updated in the last ten years. The page gets around 30k views per year but Scrum (another methodology) got 1.3 Million views. I also think it could have more references that just Cockburn's book - David Waters 03:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:34, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:46, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't know how Crystal Clear is supposed to be different from any other Agile methodology from reading this article, and can find no secondary sources that describe this specific methodology. It's too specific a term to redirect to Alistair Cockburn IMO. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.