Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crescent studios
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, as non-notable.
- Crescent studios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
They apparently specialize in posting stop-motion Lego movies on YouTube and Google Videos. I am having real trouble finding any evidence of notability or widespread popularity. So Awesome (talk) 14:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree. Also, Royaldarkwolf, who is the only editor to have contributed to this article (except for So Awesome, who nominated it for deletion, seems to be a single-purpose account intended to promote his/her company, because the only two edits he made were on Crescent studios. This, of course, explains the very positive view of the article w.r.t. crescent studios. Screen stalker (talk) 15:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you now look at the Crescent Studios Page we have edited it and made alterations to it based on your comments. If you find any more problems, please do not hesitate to contact me so I can change it as fast as possible.Royaldarkwolf (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence of notability and it is unlikely that there will be any. // Chris (complaints)•(contribs) 15:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — does not meet notability criteria for companies or films. ... discospinster talk 16:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you look carefully at the article we never said it was famous, if you find any more problems, please let me know, and please get it off the deletion list!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Royaldarkwolf (talk • contribs)
- Comment — if it's not famous, then why does it belong on Wikipedia? ... discospinster talk 19:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Does not meet WP:NOTE. Frank | talk 22:49, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.