Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Cummz (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Courtney Cummz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails ENT and GNG. PORNBIO saved it last time - although the arguments it passed that were spurious so it's time to look again. Spartaz ^Humbug! 15:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:46, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:00, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:ENT / WP:BASIC. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:50, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Virtually meets WP:BASIC, but lacks sources.Guilherme Burn (talk) 22:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. How can a person virtually meet WP:BASIC while lacking sources? The references in the article are a. repackaged announcements and press releases. b. cast listings (not significant coverage) or c. porn award lists (again not significant coverage). Lack of coverage by secondary sources is also a failure of WP:ENT. An independent search for sources yields brief mentions (e.g. a costar borrowed the name of a real person) or quotations from the subject (primary source). • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I almost forgot: d. self-published sources. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.