Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copper Fire (2020)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:11, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copper Fire (2020)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about grass fire which does not meet the threshold of WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. This is a relatively small fire at 48 acres, for it to be considered notable or significant for any audience outside of the direct area. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:49, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only 48 acres at its largest, and 60% contained after one day, garnering little attention in reporting sources. Closed a highway for a few hours, and the precautionary evacuation order was lifted less than 24 hours later; big deal. Only one fire crew response needed. Small potatoes in the wildfire context. Calfire doesn't even maintain a full statistical page on it. TJRC (talk) 18:55, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with @TJRC: and everyone else, delete it as author request --♦/\/\/\TheGeometryDashFan/\/\/\♦ (talk) 13:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I agree with TJRC. This is completely lacking in notability and any significance regardless of how it is parsed. Paul H. (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This fire is not notable. CountyCountry (talk) 06:51, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.