Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool Effect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:30, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cool Effect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Inline sources are not about the company and search of the numbered references in the "References" section doesn't return anything either. Google news presence is limited to press releases. Prod contested by IP without comment. shoy (reactions) 12:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. Sources aren't actual sources, just titles. Article is written like an advertisement. Possible COI/Promo considering the creator's name. Jergling (talk) 15:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not seeing enough coverage to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and the article reads as awfully promotional (e.g. section headings like "Why Cool Effect" and "Project Pricing"). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 23:47, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough third-party, independent coverage. Appears to be about 6 months old, so this is more promotional than informational. May be appropriate at a later date. LaMona (talk) 21:54, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Purely promotional, company is not-notable. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 04:58, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.