Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Color magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Color magazine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One legitimate entry, one definition and a hopeless redlink, so there's no need for a disambiguation page. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. SharabSalam (talk) 07:16, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: now a legitimate disambig page, following the creation of colour supplement. -- The Anome (talk) 10:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a useful dab page. Hog Farm (talk) 20:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: now a good disambiguation page. PamD 23:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, following useful edits. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.