Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Beau
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:30, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Christopher Beau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Autobiography of non-notable artist with very little secondary source coverage that I could find. I only found a single mention in his local paper. [1] Gigs (talk) 19:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, unremarkable person with very little coverage. The references on the page don't even represent this person at all, I know of an Australian news sight named www.andyworthington.com which isn't about an Andy Worthington, this is the same case and as already said, nothing about this guy on the references. I'm surprised this didn't qualify for db-person. ToxicWasteGrounds 19:30, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 19:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- --Darkwind (talk) 19:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete but not speedy. There are assertions of significance, but I can't see something that meets WP:ARTIST or WP:N, especially in terms of sources. Ty 20:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Lithoderm 23:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above...Modernist (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.