Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christina Broccolini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Broccolini

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only ref provided is a trivial mention.Google search turns up Facebook, Twitter, a Kickstarter account, and a number of self-published items. Google Books turns up what looks like only one hit, and it is also a trivial mention. Google News hits are only another list of trivial mentions.Subject does not appear to meet the requirements set out in WP:ACTOR. No awards, no significant coverage in published reliable independent verifiable secondary sources. Article creator's account has been blocked for copyright violations as well as abusing multiple accounts. KDS4444 ^(talk) [Note: This user has admitted participating in paid editing, though he has no COI with regard to this article at all.] 14:03, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:40, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR (note: nomination mistakenly cites WP:ACTOR). Rivertorch^FIRE _WATER 21:36, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet the notability requirements for entertainers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.