Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherprang Areekul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 03:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cherprang Areekul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not seem to meet the notability guidelines regarding people. So, it is hereby proposed that the article be deleted or redirected to List of BNK48 members. --หมวดซาโต้ (talk) 15:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 15:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 15:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is not a question of notability—the subject has been individually profiled in enough publications to satisfy the GNG as a stand-alone article.[1][2][3][4] The question is rather whether there's enough content to warrant a separate article, or if it'd be better to merge and redirect. This isn't really a matter for AfD. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:44, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
keep Well if Paul 012 says is right, notability is OK, and a standalone article is suitable, and hopefully it will be expanded when someone can read those sources and write about this person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paul_012. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 02:28, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject of the article has been individually profiled in enough notable/reliable publications to satisfy the GNG as a stand-alone article. The article needs to be expanded though as it is not very informative.desmay (talk) 16:11, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Paul_012. --Tvcccp (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as the subject has really no personal works and is only notable as a member of the group. Also, most of her content here was already written in the other page. --Ingfa7599 (talk) 14:20, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.