Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaiyapoj Netsiri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 16:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chaiyapoj Netsiri

The subject of this article appears to lack sufficient notability for inclusion: the subject does not seem to have received non-trivial coverage in independent, reliable sources. No such sources are given in the article and an online search for sources (including a standard web search and Google News, Scholar and Books searches) yields only about 30 non-duplicate, non-mirror results, most of which provide only directory-level coverage or passing mentions of the person. The only source that provides non-trivial coverage is this CV. Proposed deletion of the article was contested, so I am bringing it to AfD. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:35, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 20:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As Black Falcon says, there is very little evidence of third party sources and even the article contains nothing particularly remarkable. The original author was one Cnetsiri, also. Tombomp (talk/contribs) 20:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not appear to satisfy WP:ACADEMIC. GoogleScholar returns little in terms of citability of his work:[1], three papers with citation hits of 23, 9 and 6 (all three joint papers and only one, with 6 hits, has him as the first author). Similarly scant results in WebOfScience: 4 papers by him listed there with top citation hits of 10 and 7 (MEDLINE lists 3 papers by him). For an active expeimental field like brain imaging that is rather scant. He seemed to have held a temporary research position, presumably on somebody's grant, at Columbia's brain imaging lab, as he is listed under "past members" there[2], but it is not clear where he works now. No significant awards listed on his CV either. Does not pass any of the criteria of WP:ACADEMIC. Nsk92 (talk) 12:19, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As stated above, the scant academic evidence of notability is basically joint effort stuff. --Stormbay (talk) 20:08, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Nsk92. --Crusio (talk) 13:39, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.