Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catacomb Snatch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Mojang#Games. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Catacomb Snatch

(Find video game sources: "Catacomb Snatch" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Really non-notable. A single game created for charity, has almost completely first-party references and fails GNG. Delete or at best merge into Mojang. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 19:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No wp:notability-suitable sources......well maybe 1/2 of one. The rest are blogs, dead links, and from pages of sites that have noting about this on them. North8000 (talk) 19:22, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Mojang#Games, including "Uber" fork info. Charity info is already in Humble Bundle Mojam#Humble Bundle Mojam. Here is another source on the game, but that still doesn't really pass WP:NOTNEWS and very borderline on WP:GNG, since the bundle is the subject of these and not the game per se. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:58, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Mojang per HK above. All RS in the article are for a fork of the game. It isn't GNG notable by itself, but it's worth at least an extended mention on Mojang's page. czar · · 03:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Mojang#Games. The coverage is about the Humble Bundle more than the game itself. Diego (talk) 13:47, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.