Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassandra Whitehead
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Chick Bowen 04:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Another reality show contestant who lost. She didn't lose; she quit, and someone has suggested this is notable. She's also failed to win a couple of non-national beauty pageants. Nothing else noteworthy. Mikeblas 22:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the series main article. Her quitting is worthy of a minor note within the main series article, but she as an individual is not notable. She also does not appear to pass WP:BIO, assuming the present article accurately represents her accomplishments. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 22:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I believe that her quitting is (mildly, weakly, kinda) notable... she was a semi-finalist in the Miss Texas Teen USA pageant twice & competed 2 other times (competing against over 100 girls from across Texas, and had to win local titles to do so - was Miss Houston Teen USA 2003), related to Miss Texas USA 2003 titleholder & Amazing Race contestant Nicole O'Brian. Its tenuous, but I think there is some notability there. 2000 ghits. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 22:25, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Somehow I missed that she was also Miss Corpus Christi 2004 and placed in the top 10 at Miss Texas USA 2005. Have added this info, referenced it and referenced some other things as well.-- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 02:37, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply I don't deny she might become notable in the future, but do minor beauty pageant titles really qualify as evidence of notability? Especially when uncited, I doubt it. It would be nice if the article had some more citations for what is in there. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 01:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable show, therefore notable person. -- TrojanMan 01:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply Does that also apply to the cameramen, janitors, studio audience members etc. who were on the show? --tjstrf Now on editor review! 01:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Obviously not. I am assuming that TrojanMan was talking about the fact that she was a major participant on the show. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 02:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - notable due to a sum of multiple events which were partially notable.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.