Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Wars (app) (2nd nomination)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Possible merging can be done through normal editorial processes. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Cartoon Wars (app) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A page about an app which claims no special notability. Not notable - fails notability guidelines - just another app. Only reference is its own listing in the app store. Very strong feeling that is just an advertisment. See also WP:B2B. Velella Velella Talk 23:16, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- There were some sources mentioned in the original AFD which are currently not in the article. I don't know if any of them are good enough but if they are they could be intergrated into the article.--70.24.208.34 (talk) 23:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Gamevil per WP:Product. No established notability, quick RS search turned up nothing reliable. --Tgeairn (talk) 03:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Redirect There can be more detail added if you decide to keep. However, if you decide to merge, I've already placed merge tags. Web+TV+3=WebTV3! (talk) 02:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. References now added from previous AFD. A412 (Talk • C) 06:52, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Could probably be argued to pass the GNG, but I think the content would be better off in the article of the parent company. Kevin (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.